THE COMPARISON ASSESSMENT OF USING MULTIPLE CHOICE VERSUS MULTIPLE TRUE FALSE TEST ITEMS ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION

Aprilia, Yeza (2024) THE COMPARISON ASSESSMENT OF USING MULTIPLE CHOICE VERSUS MULTIPLE TRUE FALSE TEST ITEMS ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu.

	Text (Skripsi) DEPAN.pdf - Submitted Version Download (1MB)
	Text (Skripsi) BAB I.pdf - Submitted Version Download (201kB)
	Text (Skripsi) BAB II.pdf - Submitted Version Download (298kB)
	Text (Skripsi) YEZA APRILIA 2011230004.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Assessment in a class is something that can greatly influence evaluation in learning. Apart from being able to see the limits of students' abilities, assessments can also be a benchmark for teachers to see whether learning objectives have been achieved or not. Using suitable test items can make students better understand the reading in the questions. Using Multiple Trump false and Multiple Choice can be suitable test items that teachers can use in assessing student abilities. Based on research results, it proves that the use of Multiple True False and Multiple Choice has a significant effect on student learning outcomes.

Actions (login required)

View Item